1. ​​​​​Aebischer AS, Lang-Lemckert J, Du P, Wall C. Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Replacement for Non-Oncologic Indications in Australia. J Arthroplasty. 2026;41(1):169-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.019.
     
  2. Bhanushali A, Holder C, McAuliffe MJ, Martin D, Smitham PJ. Revision Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Surgeons of Varying Experience: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Study. J Arthroplasty. 2026;41(2):443-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.050.
     
  3. Brown ZG, Loch AR, Holder C, Wall CJ. Does Relative Femoral and Tibial Component Size Influence Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2026;41(1):125-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.033.
     
  4. Cho CH, Abrahams JM, Sharma DK, Solomon LB, Wall CJ, Pijls BG, Callary SA. Association of acetabular implants with sensitive radiographic surveillance on revision rates: a study based on 5 hip arthroplasty registries. Acta Orthop. 2026;97:60-6. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45292.
     
  5. Ghadirinejad K, Graves S, de Steiger R, Pratt N, Solomon LB, Taylor M, Hashemi R. Can a machine learning approach contribute to monitoring post-market surveillance of total knee arthroplasty prostheses? Knee. 2026;58:104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2025.10.020.
     
  6. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Du P, Bokor DJ. Does the rate of revision vary in primary total stemmed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with short or conventional humeral stems? JSES Int. 2026;10(1):101378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.015.
     
  7. Lewis PL, Campbell DG, Du P, Oakey H, De Steiger RN, Smith PN. Association of antioxidant-added highly cross-linked polyethylene on revision risk: a registry-based study of 198,073 total hip replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between 2014 and 2023. Acta Orthop. 2026;97:28-34. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.45181.
     
  8. Onggo JR, Jamieson R, Du P, Gill DRJ, Wang K. Revision rates between obese and nonobese total shoulder arthroplasty patients: an Australian registry data study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2026;35(2):463-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.036.
     
  9. Peckston DC, D'Costa E, Gill DR, Harries D, Page R, Baba M. A comparative analysis of a central metaphyseal humeral fixation stemless shoulder arthroplasty to an anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in a national registry cohort. Shoulder Elbow. 2026;18(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241307245.
     
  10. Saidy E, Du P, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL, Leie M. Can Robotic-Assisted Arthroplasty Change the High Early Revision Rate After Patello-femoral Arthroplasty? An Analysis From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2026;41(2):423-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.035.
     
  11. Scanlon JP, McAuliffe MJ, Du P, Leie M. Obesity is associated with higher rates of revision following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2026;61:104419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104419.