1. Lewis PL, Campbell DG, Lorimer M, Requicha F, W-Dahl A, Robertsson O. Primary total knee arthroplasty revised for instability: a detailed registry analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(2):286-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.002.
  1. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Dyer C, Graves SE, Bingham R. In revision THA is the re-revision risk for dislocation and aseptic causes greater in dual-mobility constructs or large femoral head bearings? A study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(6):1091-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085.
  1. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Holder C, Graves SE, Bingham R. Revision for aseptic loosening of highly porous acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 20,993 total hip replacements. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(2):312-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.011.
  1. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Peng Y, Graves SE, Bingham R. The Effect of Surgical Approach and Femoral Prosthesis Type on Revision Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the Most Commonly Utilized Cementless Stems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(1):24-32. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00487.

  2. Soh S-E, Harris IA, Cashman K, Graves SE, Ackerman IN. Crosswalks between the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments. Osteoarthr Cartil 2022; 30(4):570-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.004.

  3. Lewis PL, Annette W, Robertsson O, Lorimer M, Prentice HA, Graves SE, Paxton EW. The effect of patient and prosthesis factors on revision rates after total knee replacement using a multi-registry meta-analytic approach. Acta Orthop. 2022;93:284-293. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.1997.

  4. Davis JS, Metcalf S, Clark B, Robinson JO, Huggan P, Luey C, McBride S, Aboltins C, Nelson R, Campbell D, Solomon LB, Schneider K, Loewenthal MR, Yates P, Athan E, Cooper D, Rad B, Allworth T, Reid A, Read K, Leung P, Sud A, Nagendra V, Chean R, Lemoh C, Mutalima N, Tran T, Grimwade K, Sehu M, Looke D, Torda A, Aung T, Graves S, Paterson DL, Manning L, Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network. Predictors of treatment success following peri-prosthetic joint infection: 24-month follow up from a multi-center prospective observational cohort study of 653 patients. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(3):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac048.

  5. Babazadeh S, de Steiger RN, Holder C, van Bavel D. Cemented polished tapered stems have lower revision rates than commonly used cementless implant up to 17 years follow-up: An analysis of 201,889 total hip replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). J Arthroplasty. 2022;37:110-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.013.

  6. Dalton P, Holder C, Rainbird S, Lewis PL. Survivorship comparisons of ultra-congruent, cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized tibial inserts using a single knee system design: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(3):468-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.001.

  7. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Lorimer M, Graves SE, Bingham R. What can we learn from surgeons who perform THA and TKA and have the lowest revision rates? A study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(3):464-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002007.

  8. Farey JE, Cuthbert AR, Adie S, Harris IA. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty does not result in a higher risk of revision compared with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: an instrumental variable analysis of 36,118 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(10):919-27. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00972.

  9. Soh S-E, Harris IA, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves SE, Ackerman IN. Minimal clinically important changes in HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 scores following joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104:980-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00741.

  10. Mulford JS, Mathew R, Penn D, Cuthbert AR, de Steiger R. Periprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(5):1165-1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17547.

  11. Gill S, Graves S, Lorimer M, de Steiger R, Ackerman I, Ellis A, Page R. COVID-19 impact on joint replacement surgery in Australia in 2020: a nationwide perspective. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(1-2):10-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17343.

  12. Aebischer AS, Hau R, de Steiger RN, Holder C, Christopher J W. Distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic fractures after TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry review. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(7):1354-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115.

  13. Klasan A, Parker DA, Lewis PL, Young SW. Low percentage of surgeons meet the minimum recommended unicompartmental knee arthroplasty usage thresholds: Analysis of 3037 surgeons from three national joint registries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(3):958-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06437-7.

  14. Munugoda IP, Brennan-Olsen SL, Wills K, Cai G, Graves SE, Lorimer M, Cicuttini FM, Callisaya ML, Aitken D, Jones G. The association between socioeconomic status and joint replacement of the hip and knee: A population-based cohort study of older adults in Tasmania. Intern Med J. 2022; 52(2): 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.15066.

  15. Ackerman IN, Soh S-E, de Steiger R. Actual versus forecast burden of primary hip and knee replacement surgery in Australia: Analysis of data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Clin Med. 2022; 11:1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071883.

  16. Harris IA, Peng Y, Cashman K, Ackerman I, Heath E, Rowden N, Graves SE. Association between patient factors and hospital completeness of a patient-reported outcome measures program in joint arthroplasty, a cohort study. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2022;6(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00441-2.

  17. Heath EL, Ackerman II, Lorimer MF, Rainbird S, O'Donohue G, Brock A, Graves S, Harris IA. National implementation of an electronic patient reported outcome measures program for joint replacement surgery: a pilot study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(4):e30245. https://doi.org/10.2196/30245.

  18. Wall CJ, de Steiger RN, Vertullo CJ, Stoney JD, Graves SE, Lorimer MF, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of undergoing knee replacement in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92:1814-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17689.

  19. McBride AP, Ross M, Hoy G, Duke P, Page R, Peng Y, Taylor F. Mid-term outcomes of pyrocarbon humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to metal humeral resurfacing and metal stemmed hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis in young patients: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(4):755-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.017.

  20. Ackerman IN, Busija L, Lorimer M, de Steiger R, Graves SE. Monitoring the lifetime risk of revision knee arthroplasty over a decade: a population-level analysis of Australian national registry data. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(5):613-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.104b5.Bjj-2021-1219.R1.

  21. Klasan A, Rainbird S, Peng Y, Holder C, Parkinson B, Young SW, Lewis PL. No difference in revision rate between low viscosity and high viscosity cement used in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;27(10):2025-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.043.

  22. Perry TA, Silman A, Culliford D, Gates L, Arden N, Bowen C, Harris IA, Dyer CN, Beischer A, Ackerman I, Furnes O, Hallan G, Mäkelä KT, Stenholm M, Henricson A, McKie J, Muir D, The International Ankle Arthroplasty Registry Consortium. Survival of primary ankle replacements: data from global joint registries. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022;15(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00539-2.

  23. Sinagra ZP, Davis JS, Lorimer M, de Steiger RN, Graves SE, Yates P, Manning L. The accuracy of reporting of periprosthetic joint infection to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Bone Joint Open. 2022;3(5):367-74. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.35.Bjo-2022-0011.R1.

  24. Sandow M, Page R, Hatton A, Peng Y. Total Shoulder replacement stems in osteoarthritis – short, long or reverse? An analysis of the impact of cross-linked polyethylene. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(11):2249-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.015.

  25. Heath EL, Ackerman IN, Holder C, Lorimer MF, Graves SE, Harris IA. Between-hospital and between-surgeon variation in thresholds for hip and knee replacement. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92:2229-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17811.

  26. MacDessi SJ, Wernecke GC, Bastiras D, Hooper T, Heath E, Lorimer M, Harris I. Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e051088. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051088.

  27. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Holder C, Stoney J, Graves SE, Bingham R. A comparison of revision rates and dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm femoral heads and different cup sizes: an analysis of 188,591 primary total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(16):1462-74. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.21.01101.

  28. Wall CJ, Vertullo CJ, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Lorimer MF, de Steiger RN. A prospective, longitudinal study of the influence of obesity on total knee arthroplasty revision rate: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(15):1386-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.21.01491.

  29. Farey JE, Masters J, Cuthbert AR, Iversen P, van Steenbergen LN, Prentice HA, Adie S, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR, Paxton EW, Costa ML, Overgaard S, Rogmark C, Rolfson O, Harris IA. Do dual-mobility cups reduce revision risk in femoral neck fractures compared with conventional THA designs? An international meta-analysis of arthroplasty registries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022; 480(10): 1912-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002275.

  30. Harris IA, Kirwan DP, Peng Y, Lewis PL, de Steiger RN, Graves SE. Increased early mortality after total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation compared with technology-assisted surgery: an analysis of linked national registry data. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e055859. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055859.

  31. Page RS, Alder-Price AC, Rainbird S, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Peng Y, Holder C, Lorimer MF, Gill SD. Reduced revision rates in total shoulder arthroplasty with crosslinked polyethylene: results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(10):1940-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002293.

  32. Harris IA, Peng Y, Ackerman I, Graves SE. The association between preoperative patient-reported health status and postoperative survey completion following arthroplasty: Registry-based cohort study. JMIR Perioper Med. 2022;5(1):e33414. https://doi.org/10.2196/33414.

  33. Aebischer AS, Hau R, de Steiger RN, Holder C, Wall CJ. Distal femoral arthroplasty for native knee fractures. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(7):894-901. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1136.R3.

  34. Ackerman IN, Harris IA, Cashman K, Rowden N, Lorimer M, Graves SE. Poor knee-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores at 6 months are associated with early revision knee arthroplasty: A study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(10):1899-909. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002301.

  35. Lewis PL, Annette W, Robertsson O, Prentice HA, Graves SE. Impact of patient and prosthesis characteristics on common reasons for total knee replacement revision: a registry study of 36,626 revision cases from Australia, Sweden, and USA. Acta Orthop. 2022;93:623-33. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.3512.

  36. Hoskins W, Corfield S, Lorimer M, Peng Y, Bingham R, Graves SE, Vince KG. Is the revision rate for femoral neck fracture lower for total hip arthroplasty than for hemiarthroplasty? A comparison of registry data for contemporary surgical options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(17):1530-41. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01256.

  37. de Steiger RN, Lewis PL, Harris I, Lorimer MF, Graves SE. What is the outcome of the first revision procedure of primary THA for osteoarthritis? A study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(10):1952-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002339.

  38. CRISTAL Study Group. Effect of aspirin vs enoxaparin on symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty: The CRISTAL Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(8):719-27. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.13416.

  39. Gill DRJ, Gill SD, Corfield S, Holder C, Page RS. Primary inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher rate of revision than onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Shoulder Elbow. 2022. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221122275.

  40. Jin X, Gallego Luxan B, Hanly M, Pratt NL, Harris I, de Steiger R, Graves SE, Jorm L. Estimating incidence rates of periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis using linked registry and administrative health data. Bone Joint J. 2022;104(9):1060-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B9.BJJ-2022-0116.R1.

  41. Farey JE, Hooper T, Alland T, Naylor JM, Kelly T-L, Lorimer M, Lewin AM, Rogers M, Law CK, Close J, Graves SE, de Steiger RS, Lewis PL, Adie S, Harris IA. Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e064478.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064478.

  42. Pratt NL, Cicuttini FM, Wang Y, Graves SE. No increased risk of cancer associated with metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-ceramic procedures compared to other bearing surfaces in patients with total hip arthroplasty: A nationwide linked registry cohort analysis of 167,837 patients. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0278241.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278241.

  43. Lourens EC, Kurmis AP, Holder C, de Steiger RN. Early Revision Rates of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Intellijoint HIP Computer Navigation System: A Study From the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry of 1911 Procedures. Arthroplasty Today. 2022;18:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.019.