1.  Hoskins W, Bingham R, Corfield S, Harries D, Harris IA, Vince KG. Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 482:98-112. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002737.
  1. Osan JK, Harris IA, Harries D, Peng Y, Yates PJ, Jones CW. Stemmed Tibial Fixation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients-A National Registry Study. J Arthroplasty. 2024; 39:355-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.0283.
  1. Osan JK, Harris I, Harries D, Peng Y, Yates PJ, Jones CW. Utilizing Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Data. J Arthroplasty. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.031.
  1. Fang YY, Ackerman IN, Page R, Harris IA, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Heath E, Soh SE. Measurement properties of the Oxford Shoulder Score and minimal clinically important changes after primary total shoulder replacement surgery. Arthritis Care Res. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25304.
  1. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Harries D, Page RS. A comparison of revision rates for stemmed and stemless primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with all polyethylene glenoid components: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024; 33(2):281-90​​​​​​. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.025.
  1. Taylor F, Page R, Wheeler J, Lorimer M, Corfield S, Peng Y, Burnton J. Distal Humeral Hemiarthroplasty compared to Total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures: a registry analysis of 906 procedures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024; 33(2):356-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.001.
  1. Taylor F, Gilpin BD, Sivakumar BS, Holder C, Page R, Graham DJ. Increasing Use of Total Wrist Arthroplasty: An Australian National Joint Registry Report J Wrist Surg. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777408. 
  1. Rodríguez AO, Smith PN, Johnson P, O'Sullivan M, Holder C, Shimmin A. Registry-based study of survivorship of cemented femoral components versus collared cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty in older patients with osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B(3 Suppl A):121-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B3.BJJ-2023-0771.R1.
  1. Tierney J, Jackman E, Holder C, Wall CJ, Wilson CJ. Increased Rates of Late Periprosthetic Fractures in Larger Hydroxyapatite-Coated Cementless Stems: Are Collared Stems a Better Alternative for Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2024;39:744-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.068.

  1. Lewin AM, Cashman K, Harries D, Ackerman IN, Naylor JM, Harris IA. First knee for pain and function versus second knee for quality of life. Bone Joint Open. 2024;5(3):202-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.Bjo-2023-0035.R1.

  2. Gill DR, Corfield S, Holder C, Page RS. Characteristics associated with re-revision of primary inlay and onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Semin Arthroplast: JSES. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2024.02.002.

  3. Ghadirinejad K, Graves S, de Steiger R, Pratt N, Solomon LB, Taylor M, Hashemi R. What Is the Most Appropriate Comparator to Use in Assessing the Comparative Performance of Primary Total Knee Prostheses? A Registry-Based Study. Arthroplasty Today. 2024;27:101344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101344. 

  4. Ackerman IN, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Heath E, Harris IA. Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00713-z.

  5. Zhou Y, Harries D, Stoney JD. A Polished Cobalt-Chrome Baseplate is not Associated with a Lower Revision Rate than Matt Titanium in a Single Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant System with Identical Baseplate Design. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(4):896-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.003.

  6. Vercruysse LYG, Milne LP, Harries DTC, de Steiger RN, Wall CJ. Lower Revision Rates and Improved Stability with a Monoblock Ceramic Acetabular Cup. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(4):985-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.032.

  7. Ghadirinejad K, Milimonfared R, Taylor M, Solomon LB, Graves S, Pratt N, de Steiger R, Hashemi R. Supervised machine learning for the prediction of post-operative clinical outcomes of hip and knee replacements: a review. ANZ J Surg. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19003.

  8. Nyring MR, Rasmussen JV, Gill DR, Harries D, Olsen BS, Page RS. Comparable low revision rates of stemmed and stemless total anatomic shoulder arthroplasties after exclusion of metal backed glenoid components: a collaboration between the Australian and Danish national shoulder arthroplasty registries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.02.

  9. Rele S, O’Bryan E, Holder C, Lewis PL, Di Bella C. Collared Cementless Femoral Components Reduce the Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study. J Arthroplasty. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.009.

  10. Handford C, Campbell R, Lorimer M, Molnar R, Harris IA. Risk of early revision in total hip arthroplasty: the relative contribution of the surgeon versus the hospital. ANZ J Surg. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19031.

  11. Hoskins W, Corfield S, Peng Y, Graves SE, Bingham R. A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties. HIP Internat. 2024; Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241239914.

  12. Leta TH, Lie SA, Fenstad AM, Lygre SHL, Lindberg-Larsen M, Pedersen AB, W-Dahl A, Rolfson O, Bülow E, van Steenbergen LN, Nelissen RGHH, Harries D, de Steiger R, Lutro O, Mäkelä K, Venäläinen MS, Willis J, Wyatt M, Frampton C, Grimberg A, Steinbrück A, Wu Y, Armaroli C, Gentilini MA, Picus R, Bonetti M, Dragosloveanu S, Vorovenci AE, Dragomirescu D, Dale H, Brand C, Christen B, Shapiro J, Wilkinson JM, Armstrong R, Wooster K, Hallan G, Gjertsen J-E, Chang RN, Prentice HA, Sedrakyan A, Paxton EW and Furnes O. Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12898.

  13. Wall CJ, Vertullo CJ, Gill DR, Page RS, Holder C, and Smith PN. Reduced numbers of elective joint replacement procedures in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020–2022: a registry data analysis study. Med J Aust. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52318.

  14. Ackerman IN, Norman R, Harris IA, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Gill S, Lewis PL, Soh SE. How Does the New Australian EQ‑5D‑5L Value Set Impact Utility Scores? Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-024-00894-0.

  15. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Harries D, Page RS. Modelling XLPE vs non-XLPE glenoid revision rates for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis including differing polyethylene glenoid fixation designs. Semin Arthroplasty: JSES. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.003.

  16. Hoskins W, Bingham R, Graves SE, Harries D, Cuthbert AR, Corfield S, Smith P, Vince KG. What Are the Relative Associations of Surgeon Performance and Prosthesis Quality With THA Revision Rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. Published ahead of print. http://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003217. 

  17. Van Meirhaeghe JP, Harris IA, Cuthbert A, Lorimer M, McAuliffe M, Adie S, Molnar R. The influence of implant factors on patient outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2024;58:154-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.011.

  18. Kumar N, Gabbe BJ, Page RS, Soh S-E, Gill DRJ, Harries D, Ackerman IN. Demographics, Indications, and Revision Rates for Radial Head Arthroplasty: Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00072.

  19. Jomaa MN, Ingoe H, Hollman F, Pareyón R, Whitehouse SL, Du P, Gill DR, Maharaj J, Gupta A, Cutbush K. Stemless Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients under 55 years of age with Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: An analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at five years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.032.

  20. Ayoola AS, Charters MA, Raja HM, Weseman L, Lewis PL, Peng Y, North WT. Survivorship of Primary NexGen Knee Replacement: Comparing Cementless Trabecular Metal to Other Designs of Tibial Component. J Knee Surg. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2376-6889.

  21. Sandow M, Gill DR. Access to Shoulder Arthroplasty in Australia – A balance of regulation, surveillance and monitored efficacy to maximise patient outcome and optimum care. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024.Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.042.

  22. Raubenheimer K, Atkinson M, Yan M, Perret M, Bauer S, Harries D, Gill DRJ, Blakeney WG. Cemented vs Cementless Stems for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Registry Analysis with Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Level 1 Trauma Centre. JSES Internat. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.023.

  23. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Harries D, Page RS. Comparing optimum prosthesis combinations of total stemmed, stemless and reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rates for men and women with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.033.

  24. McAuliffe M, Darwish I, Anderson J, Nicholls A, Corfield S, Harries D, Vertullo C. Association of Technology Usage and Decreased Revision TKA Rates for Low-Volume Surgeons Using an Optimal Prosthesis Combination: An Analysis of 53,264 Primary TKAs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00539. 

  25. Ghadirinejad K, Graves S, de Steiger R, Pratt N, Solomon LB, Taylor M, Hashemi R. Can Machine Learning Algorithms Contribute to the Initial Screening of Hip Prostheses and Early Identification of Outliers? Prosthesis 2024;6:744-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040052.

  26. Onggo JR, Holder C, McAuliffe MJ, Babazadeh S. No Increased Risk of Patella Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent Versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties with an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005.

  27. Zhou Y, Fraval A, Vertullo CJ, Du P, Babazadeh S, Stevens J. Patient and Surgical Factors Associated with Long-term Mortality Outcomes up to Fifteen Years after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study. J Arthroplasty. 2024. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.012.

  28. Sidhu V, Kelly TL, Pratt N, Graves SE, Buchbinder R, Adie S, Cashman K, Ackerman IN, Bastiras D, Brighton R. Aspirin or enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after primary partial, total or revision hip or knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis from the CRISTAL cluster randomized trial. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0298152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298152.