1. Ingoe H, Pareyon R, Jomaa M, Launay M, Italia K, Maharaj J, Gill D, Holder C, Whitehouse S, Cutbush K, Gupta A. Glenoid morphology classification and Computed Tomography Scanning prior to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Population-Level Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. JSES Internat. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.025.

  1. Sandow M, Gill DR. Access to Shoulder Arthroplasty in Australia – A balance of regulation, surveillance and monitored efficacy to maximise patient outcome and optimum care. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025;34(1):328-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.042.

  2. Xu J, Sivakumar BS, Nandapalan H, Moopanar T, Harries D, Page R, Symes M. Trends in the surgical management of proximal humerus fractures over the last 20 years from Australian registry databases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025;35(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04165-5.  
  1. Wall CJ, de Steiger RN, Vertullo CJ, Harries D, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. ASA Class is a Stronger Predictor of Early Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty than BMI. JBJS Open Access. 2025;10(1):e24.00064. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Oa.24.00064.

  1. Hoskins W, Bingham R, Graves SE, Harries D, Cuthbert AR, Corfield S, Smith P, Vince KG. What are the Relative Associations of Surgeon Performance and Prosthesis Quality with THA Revision Rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025;483(2):237-249. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003217. 

  2. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Du P, Harries D, Page RS. Comparative and predictive modelling of modern anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty revision rates in osteoarthritis with different polyethylene glenoid designs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.030.

  3. Gill DRJ, Corfield S, Du P, McAuliffe MJ. The changing effect of surgeon volume on revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty with time in Australia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.037.

  4. Jomaa M, Ingoe H, Hollman F, Pareyon R, Whitehouse SL, Du P, Gill DRJ, Maharaj J, Gupta A, Cutbush K. Stemless anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at 5 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025;34(4):1032-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.032.

  5. MacDessi SJ, Wernecke GC, Bastiras D, Ghadirinejad K, Harries D, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Holder C, Harris IA. Statistical analysis plan for the Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Kinematic ALignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL) registry-nested randomized trial. Bone Jt Open. 2025;6(3):352-60. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.63.Bjo-2024-0206.

  6. Raubenheimer K, Atkinson M, Yan M, Perret M, Bauer S, Harries D, Gill DRJ, Blakeney WG. Cemented vs. cementless stems for reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a registry analysis with patient-reported outcomes from a level 1 trauma centre. JSES International. 2025;9(2):415-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.023.

  7. Onggo JR, Holder C, McAuliffe MJ, Babazadeh S. No Increased Risk of Patella-Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties With an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2025;40(5):1225-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005