ISAR Congress 2026

  1. Ackerman I, Eng K, Oakey H, Gill D and Gill S. National outcomes from total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in Australia. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  2. Bain C, Carey D, Holder C and McAuliffe M. Does adjustment for multiple confounders impact surgeon performance categorization? An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) Analysis. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  3. Brown Z, Loch A, Holder C and Wall C. Does Relative Femoral and Tibial Component Size Influence Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  4. De Steiger R, Lewis P, Smith P and Xu Q. Cross linked polyethylene: The best thing to happen to Hip Joint Arthroplasty this century. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  5. Gill D, Corfield S, Xu Q and Cass B. Does highly or non-highly cross linked polyethylene bearing surfaces change the rate of revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  6. Hoskins W, Gusho C, Bingham R, Du P, Oakey H, Vince K and McAuliffe M. Does commencing robotic assistance decrease revision rates or change the modes of failure for surgeons who perform total knee arthroplasty? An analysis stratified by surgeons’ pre-robotic revision rates and a comparative analysis of individual surgeons at a national level. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  7. Hoskins W, Gusho C, McAuliffe M, Wall C, Xu Q and Vince K. POSTER: What is the ideal technique and implant in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of second revision and component loosening rates from the AOANJRR. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  8. Lewis P, Campbell D, Smith P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Holder C. Excess mortality associated with hip arthroplasty revisions for fracture. A registry analysis. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  9. Lewis P, Smith P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Xu Q. Has there been improvement in revision hip and knee outcomes in Australia during the last 25 years? 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  10. Righolt C, Poitras C, Holder C, Lewis P, Turgeon T and Bohm E. Aseptic loosening in small quadrangular tapered hydroxyapatite-coated stems: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry study. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  11. Righolt C, Poitras C, Lanting B, Holder C, Lewis P and Bohm E. Comparing cemented and cementless versions of the same implant: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry matched cohort study. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden
  12. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Holder C. Increased Revision Risk with Robotic Assisted Hip Replacement 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  13. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C, Holder C and McCaul M. The Dual Mobility Hip Replacement Paradox– a lower rate of revision for dislocation but a higher rate of revision for periprosthetic fracture. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  14. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Oakey H. The Influence of Surgical Approach on Outcomes for Aseptic Revision Hip Replacement. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  15. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Xu Q. Title: Poor outcomes for Revision of TKR for Arthrofibrosis. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  16. Soroush S, Riazi A, Xu Q, Wall C and Babazadeh S. Impact of technology and prosthetic usage on early revision rates for dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of 312,627 procedures from the AOANJRR. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden.
  17. Vink M, Zijlstra W, Harries D, Lorimer M, Van Steenbergen L, Corfield S, Van Raaij T, Stavrou P and Peters R. The association between bearing type and implant survival after primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA): an evaluation of Australian and Dutch registry data. 15th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries, May 30 – June 1 Lund, Sweden

Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2026

  1. McAuliffe M, Holder C, Bain C and Damien C. Does Adjustment for Multiple Confounders Impact Surgeon Performance Categorization? An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) Analysis. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  2. McAuliffe M, Hoskins W, Gusho C, Bingham R, Du P, Oakey H and K V. Does commencing robotic assistance decrease revision rates or change the modes of failure for surgeons who perform total knee arthroplasty? An analysis stratified by surgeons’ pre-robotic revision rates. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  3. McAuliffe M, Hoskins W, Gusho C, Bingham R, Du P, Oakey H and Vince K. Surgeon revision rates are highly variable in response to commencing robotic total knee arthroplasty: A comparative analysis of individual surgeons at a national level. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  4. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C, Holder C and McCaul M. The Dual Mobility Hip Replacement Paradox– a lower rate of revision for dislocation but a higher rate of revision for periprosthetic fracture. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  5. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Oakey H. The Influence of Surgical Approach on Outcomes for Aseptic Revision Hip Replacement. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia
     
  6. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Oakey H. Increased Revision Risk with Robotic Assisted Hip Replacement Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia
     
  7. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Xu Q. Poor outcomes for Revision of TKR for Arthrofibrosis. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia
     
  8. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Xu Q. Has there been improvement in revision hip outcomes in Australia during the last 25 years? Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  9. Smith P, Lewis P, McAuliffe M, Wall C and Xu Q. Has there been improvement in revision knee outcomes in Australia during the last 25 years? Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia
     
  10. Wall C, Brown Z, Loch A and Holder C. Does Relative Femoral and Tibial Component Size Influence Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  11. Wall C, Hoskins W, McAuliffe M, Xu Q and Vince K. What is the ideal technique and implant in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of second revision and component loosening rates from the AOANJRR. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia
     
  12. Wall C, Soroush S, Riazi A, Babazadeh S and Xu Q. Impact of technology and prosthetic usage on early revision rates for dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of 312,627 procedures from the AOANJRR. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 25 - 28 March Melbourne, Australia

Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2026

  1. De Steiger R, Tsigaras Z, Holder C and Wall C. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Legg-CalvÉ-Perthes Disease: A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. The International Hip Society (IHS) Meeting, 25-28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  2. Shimmin A. Impact of Offset Polyethylene Liners on Acetabular Component Loosening: An Aoanjrr Registry-Based Analysis. The International Hip Society (IHS) Meeting, 25-28 March Melbourne, Australia.
     
  3. Solomon M, Cundy W, Mo S, Holder C, Wall C and De Steiger R. What Are the Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged under 30 Years? Results from the AOANJRR. The International Hip Society (IHS) Meeting, 25–28 March Melbourne, Australia.