Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM

  1. Hanley T. Equivalence of cemented acetabular fixation with bearing and femoral construct matched comparison of 81,344 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry: A pragmatic like-for-like analysis. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.
  1. Harris I. Are PROMs responders representative of all patients undergoing joint replacement? Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Inglis M. The effect of polyethylene thickness on revision rates of contemporary cruciate retaining knee replacements: A registry analysis. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Lewis P. Better UKR survivorship with fixed bearing modular designs. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Lewis P. Does the use of assistive technology improve revision rates for total knee replacement? Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Wall C. Distal femoral replacement for distal femur periprosthetic fractures: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement registry. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Wall C. Distal femoral replacement for native knee fractures: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement registry. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

  1. Walter B. An Investigation of bias in the assessment of mortality risk and revision risk with total resurfacing hip replacement compared to total conventional hip replacement: A national registry data-linkage study. Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM 2021; 19 - 22 May 2021; Adelaide, South Australia.

EFORT Virtual Congress

  1. Campbell D, Lewis P, Nugent M, Cuthbert A, Solomon B. Use of acetabular screws in total hip replacement: A registry analysis. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. de Steiger R, Gosling O, Cuthbert A, Lewis P. Revision of primary total hip arthroplasty for leg length discrepancy: Results from a large national joint registry. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. de Steiger R, Lewis P, Graves S, Harris I, Lorimer M. Outcome of revision primary total conventional hip replacement: Results from a large national joint registry. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Graves S, Pratt N, Gulyani A, Duszynski K, Harris I, de Steiger R, Inacio M, Ackerman I, Jorm L, Lorimer M. Utilisation of anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis following total conventional hip or total knee replacement: A joint replacement registry linkage study. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Graves S, Pratt N, Kerr M, Duszynski K, Gulyani A, de Steiger R, Harris I, Inacio M, Ackerman I, Jorm L, Lorimer M. An investigation of bias in the assessment of mortality risk with total resurfacing hip replacement compared to total conventional hip replacement: A national registry data-linkage study. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Harris I, Cashman K, Ackerman I, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves S. Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the patient-reported outcome measures pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement RegistryPoster presented at 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress Online; 2021.
  1. Harris I, Peng Y, Ackerman I, Graves S, Heath E, Lorimer M. Association between patient factors and coverage of a national patient-reported outcome measures program involving people undergoing joint arthroplastyPoster presented at 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress Online; 2021.
  1. Heath E, Ackerman I, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Graves S, Harris I. Patient reported outcomes after joint replacement: Results from a large national registry. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Inglis M, Lewis P, Khan M, Wilson C, Peng Y. Effect of polyethylene thickness on revision rates of cruciate retaining knee replacements. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Lewis P, de Steiger R, Harris I, Graves S, Lorimer M. Outcome of revision primary total knee replacement: Results from a large national joint registry. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Lewis P, Kannan A, Dyer C, Jiranek W, McMahon S. Better UKR survivorship with fixed bearing modular designsPoster presented at 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress Online; 2021.
  1. Lewis P, Knight M, Lorimer M, Peng Y, Parkinson B. Survivorship of highly constrained prostheses in primary and revision knee replacement: Analysis of 6,070 cases. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.
  1. Lewis P, Robertsson O, Graves S, Paxton E, Prentice H, W-Dahl A. Variation and trends in reasons for knee replacement revision: A multi-registry study. 2nd Virtual EFORT Congress 30 June - 2 July 2021; Online.

 

ABMC Research Minireview

  1. Graves S. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry – Capabilities of CQRs. ABMC Research Minireview - SAHMRI on Clinical Registries; 12th October 2021; Virtual Presentation.

 

SAHMRI Research Showcase 

  1. Turner C. AOANJRR: Research Capability. Clinical Quality Registries and Big Data. SAHMRI Research Showcase; 8-9 November 2021; SAHMRI, South Australia.

AOA ASM

  1. ​Aebischer A, Wall C. Distal femoral replacement for distal femur periprosthetic fractures: results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  1. Aebischer A, Wall C. Distal femoral replacement for native knee fractures: results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  2. Babazadeh S, van Bavel D. Cemented polished tapered stems have lower revision rates than common cementless implants: An analysis of 201,889 total hip replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  3. de Steiger R. Do smaller sized unicompartmental knee replacements have a higher rate of revision than larger size. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  4. de Steiger R. Hip arthroplasty update. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  5. Farey J. Revision risk after unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: an instrumental variable analysis of 62,875 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  6. Farey J, Harris I. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty does not result in a higher risk of revision compared to total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: an instrumental variable analysis of 36,188 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  7. Farey J, Harris I. Dual mobility cup versus conventional total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: an international multi-registry study. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  8. Gill D. Primary inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher rate of revision than onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Analysis from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  9. Gill S. COVID. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  10. Harris I. Anticoagulation use and complications post joint replacement, a national data linkage study. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  11. Harris I. Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  12. Harris I. PROMs. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  13. Harris I. Technology-assisted TKA is associated with lower early mortality than conventional (intra-medullary) instrumentation. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  14. Heath E, Harris I. Patient reported outcomes after joint replacement: results from a large national registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  15. Holder C, Harris I. Between-hospital and between-surgeon variation in thresholds for hip and knee replacement. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  16. Hooper T. Registry Nested Clinical Trials. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  17. Jones C. An investigation of bias in the assessment of mortality risk with total resurfacing hip replacement compared to total conventional hip replacement: a national registry data-linkage study. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  18. Lewis P. Does the use of assistive technology improve revision rates for total knee replacement? AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  19. Lewis P. Knee arthroplasty update. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  20. Lewis P. Variation and trends in reasons for knee replacement revision: a multi-registry study. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  21. Mulford J. The association between Body Mass Index and pre and post-operative patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving total hip and knee arthroplasty. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  22. Nicholls A. During first 10 years of independent practice, the majority of Australian orthopaedic surgeons practice hip and knee arthroplasty at volumes below optimal safety standards. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  23. O’Donohue G. PROMs National Rollout. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  24. Page R. Shoulder arthroplasty update. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  25. Paltoglou N. Comparison of shoulder replacement outcomes between Australian public and private hospitals: A National Joint Replacement Registry Analysis. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  26. Sandow M. Total shoulder arthroplasty stems in osteoarthritis– short, long or reverse? An analysis of the impact of cross-linked polyethylene. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  27. Stavrou P. Ankle arthroplasty update. AOANJRR Annual Report. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  28. Stoney J. Should femoral head size increase with acetabular component size in total hip arthroplasty (THA)? AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  29. van Bavel D. Does patient age affect prosthesis specific revision rates in primary THR – an AOANJRR review. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  30. van Bavel D. Does using the most commonly used hip prosthesis result in a lower revision rate in primary THR –an AOANJRR review. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  31. Wall C. The incidence of obesity in patients undergoing total knee replacement in Australia. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

  32. Wall C. The influence of obesity on total knee replacement revision rate in Australia: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. AOA ASM; 8-10 November 2021; Virtual Meeting.

 

ISAR

  1. Ackerman I, Busija L, Lorimer M, de Steiger R, Graves SE. Low lifetime risk of revision knee replacement in Australia: A population-level analysis. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  2. Ackerman I, Harris I, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Rowden N, Graves S. Can knee-specific and generic patient-reported outcome scores predict early revision knee replacement? 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  3. Ackerman I, Soh S-E, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves S, Harris I. Minimal clinically important differences for the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments: Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Program. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  4. Alder-Price A, Page R, Graves S, de Steiger R, Rainbird S, Peng Y, Dyer C, Lorimer M, Gill S. Cross-linked polyethylene in primary, standard stemmed shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a lower revision rate compared to non-cross-linked polyethylene: updated results from the AOANJRR. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  5. Cuthbert AR, Giles LC, Glonek G, Ellett LMK, Pratt NL. A comparison of survival models for prediction of eight-year revision risk following total knee and hip arthroplasty. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  6. de Steiger R, Lewis PL, Graves SE, Harris I, Lorimer M. Outcome of revision primary total conventional hip replacement: Results from a large national joint registry. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  7. de Steiger R, Sims A, Harris D, Lewis P. The rate of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement is higher with smaller sized cemented tibial implants and with specific prostheses: An analysis of 50,239 unicompartmental knees from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  8. Duszynski K, Pratt N, Gulyani A, de Steiger R, Inacio M, Ackerman I, Jorm L, Lorimer M, Graves SE, Harris I. Anticoagulation use and complications post joint replacement: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry data linkage study. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  9. Ghadirinejad K, Graves S, de Steiger R, Pratt N, Solomon LB, Taylor M, Hashem R. What is the most appropriate comparator group to use in assessing the performance of primary total hip prostheses in the community? 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  10. Gill DRJ, Gill SD, Rainbird S, Holder C, Page RS. Primary inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher rate of revision than onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  11. Gill S, Graves S, Lorimer M, de Steiger R, Ackerman I, Ellis A, Page R. COVID-19 impact on joint replacement surgery in Australia – an Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry study. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  12. Harris I, Farey JE, Masters J, Cuthbert AR, Iversen P, van Steenbergen L, Prentice HA, Adie S, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR, Paxton EW, Costa ML, Overgaard S, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Dual mobility cup versus conventional total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: An international multi-registry study. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  13. Harris IA, Cashman K, Ackerman I, Graves S. Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the patient-reported outcome measures pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  14. Harris IA, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Pratt N, Lewis P, Graves SE, Luxan BG. The effect of patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes, a causal analysis. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  15. Harris IA, Peng Y, Ackerman I, Graves S. Association between patient factors and coverage of a national patient-reported outcome measures program involving people undergoing joint arthroplasty. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  16. Harris IA, Peng Y, Kirwan D, Lewis P, de Steiger R, Graves S. Technology-assisted TKA is associated with lower early mortality than conventional (intramedullary) instrumentation. Otto Robertsson Knee Paper Award. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  17. Heath E, Ackerman I, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Graves S, Harris I. Patient reported outcomes after joint replacement: Results from the AOANJRR. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  18. Holder C, Heath E, Cashman K, Ackerman I, Lorimer M, Graves S, Harris IA. Between-hospital and between-surgeon variation in thresholds for hip and knee replacement. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  19. Lewis P, Kannan A, Dyer C, Jiranek WA, McMahon S. A registry comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement bearing designs. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  20. Lewis PL, Campbell D, Lorimer M, de Steiger R, Fary C. Does the use of assistive technology improve revision rates for total knee replacement? Best Paper Award. 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries; 11-13 November 2021; 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  21. Lewis PL, de Steiger R, Graves S, Harris I, Lorimer M. Outcome of revision primary total knee replacement: results from a large national joint registry. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  22. Lewis PL, Robertsson O, Graves SE, Paxton EW, Prentice HA, W-Dahl A. Variation and trends in reasons for knee replacement revision: A multi-registry study. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  23. Paltoglou N, Page R, Graves S, Rainbird S, Lorimer M, Gill S. Does the setting of shoulder arthroplasty influence revision rates? A comparison of shoulder arthroplasty outcomes between settings at a national level. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  24. Pratt N, Kerr M, Duszynski K, Gulyani A, de Steiger R, Harris I, Inacio M, Ackerman I, Jorm L, Lorimer M, Graves SE. An investigation of bias in the assessment of mortality risk with total resurfacing hip replacement compared to total conventional hip replacement: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry linkage study. Best Poster Award. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.

  25. Stoney J, Hoskins W, Bingham R, Rainbird S, Holder C. In total hip arthroplasty 36mm femoral heads reduce early dislocations without increasing long term revision rates regardless of acetabular component size: An analysis of 188,591 primary total hip replacements. Poster presented at 10th Annual International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries. 11-13 November 2021. 2nd Annual Virtual Congress.